Credentialing of research surgeons: can computers help in the process?

H. B. Othersen, W. Chwals, C. D. Smith, E. P. Tagge, A. Hebra

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

Abstract

There has been recurring debate regarding the need for a process of ensuring that individuals who propose research using live animals will be competent in the research and compassionate in their care of animals. The mechanism by which this goal can be accomplished is presently under consideration and acceptance by investigators is of concern. As a first step, the authors propose utilization of an interactive computer program that not only would evaluate cognitive knowledge but also would instruct in areas found to be deficient. Immediate feedback with educational reinforcement is possible. The authors' interest in such a program began with a pediatric surgical postgraduate course presented in 1994 at the Clinical Congress of the American College of Surgeons. The computer program utilized was IRIS (Instantaneous Response Interactive System: IRIS, Denver, CO, USA). This system was well suited to evaluation and instantaneous feedback. That program, or one like it, would be suited to initial evaluation and education of researchers. The important aspect is interaction and immediate feedback. This article also includes the results of a panel discussion at the annual meeting of the Academy of Surgical Research in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-160
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Surgery

Cite this